HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
REENA BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 2620 of 2022
Reena Begum
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Deep Prakash Bhatt, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. V.S. Rathore, A.G.A. for the State.
Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the Informant.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant-Reena Begum is in judicial custody
in FIR No. 0265 of 2022, under Section 306 IPC, Police
Station Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has
sought her release on bail.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
3.
According to the FIR, the applicant and
co-accused
trapped
the
deceased
and
thereafter,
blackmailing. They demanded money from the deceased.
He did pay about Rs. 4,50,000/-, but still Rs.5,00,000/-
was demanded which he could not give and committed
suicide.
2
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant would
submit that no abetment of suicide was ever done by the
applicant. Applicant is a woman.
5.
Learned counsel for the informant would
submit that it is a case of ho
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.