SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
PRADEEP UNIYAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


SL.

No

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

WPCRL No. 2216 of 2022

Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J.

Shri Abhishek Bahuguna, learned counsel for

the petitioner.

Ms. Manisha Rana, learned AGA for the

State.

By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has

prayed for the quashing the impugned FIR lodged

by the respondent no. 3 on 19.04.2022 against him

bearing No. 0254 of 2022 for the alleged offences

punishable under Section 420, 506 IPC, Police

Station – Patel Nagar, District Dehradun (contained

as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition).

A careful reading of the impugned FIR

reveals that petitioner gave an impression to the

complainant / respondent no. 3 that on payment of

Rs. 20,00,000/-, he can secure a job for the him in

the Agriculture Department, State of Uttarakhand.

Thereafter, money was given to the petitioner but

he neither secured a job for the complainant nor

returned the money.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would

submit that there is no material available on record

to show that complainant has given money to him

and entire allegations

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top