HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MAHIPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY OF HOME AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF U.K. DEHRADUN – Respondent
SL.
No
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL No. 2237 of 2022
Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J.
Shri Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the
petitioner.
Ms. Manisha Rana, learned AGA for the State.
Petitioners have approached this Court for
quashing of the FIR No. 1118 of 2022 dated 28.11.2022
registered under Section 186, 332, 353, 504, 506 IPC,
Police Station – Laksar, District Haridwar.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit
that contents of the FIR are inherently improbable,
therefore, FIR should be quashed.
However, it is borne out from the records that
informant has specifically mentioned the names of the
accused persons and the fact that they abused the
informant in filthy language and then assaulted some
policemen, who were in plain clothes. This Court is of
the opinion that the contents of the FIR does make a
prima facie case in favour of the prosecution in the
sense that offences are made out against the petitioners.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit
that behaviour of the petitioners, as alleged in the FIR,
is whol
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.