SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAJENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR (SECONDARY EDUCATION), KUMAON DIVISION, NAINITAL    Advocate -C S C – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Delay Condonation Application No. 17810 of 2018

In

Special Appeal No. 948 of 2018

Rajendra Singh. ………...Appellant.

Versus.

State of Uttarakhand

and others. …....Respondents.

Present:

Mr. S.P. Singh, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand / respondents.

Coram: Hon’ble Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J.

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. (Oral)

1.

The application to condone the delay of 73 days’ in

preferring the appeal is not opposed and is, therefore, ordered.

2.

This appeal is preferred against the order passed by

learned Single Judge in WPSS No. 1922 of 2016 dated 31.07.2018.

3.

The appellant herein was the Deputy Head Examiner,

for evaluation of answer sheets pertaining to mathematics subject

for the High School Examinations held in 2015, at the evaluation

centre, Government Girls Inter College, Kashipur. On a

representation made by a student for re-examination /

revaluation of the answer sheets, vide letter date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top