HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
INDUMATI UNIYAL – Appellant
Versus
ACCOUNTANT GENERAL ACCOUNT AND ENTITLEMENT SECOND PRAYAGRAJ UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
SL.
No
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
proceedings or
directions and
Registrar’s order
with Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
12.06.2023
WPSB No. 698 of 2022
Hon’ble Vipin Sanghi, C.J.
Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1.
Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned counsel for
the petitioner.
2.
Mr.
I.D.
Paliwal,
learned
Standing
Counsel for the State of U.P., accepts notice
on behalf of respondent No. 1.
3.
Mr. Vikas Pande, learned Standing
Counsel
for
the
State
of
Uttarakhand,
accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.
2 to 4.
4.
Since the Uttarakhand Public Services
Tribunal has jurisdiction to deal with the
claim raised in this petition, we dispose of
this petition with the liberty to the petitioner
to approach the Uttarakhand Public Services
Tribunal.
5.
Considering the fact that the petitioner
is 75 years old, we stay the operation of the
impugned order for a period of three weeks,
during which period she may approach the
Tribunal.
6.
It shall be open to the Tribunal to pass
orders, including the interim orders, after
examining the merits of the petitioner’s
claim.
7.
Writ petition stands disposed of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.