SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JAGDISH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Special Appeal No. 1013 of 2019

Jagdish Chandra

...Appellant

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and others

...Respondents

Mr. D.K Joshi, learned counsel for the appellant-writ petitioner.

Mr. C.S. Rawat, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of

Uttarakhand-respondents 1 and 2.

Mr. Mukesh Kapruwan, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Xitij Kaushik,

learned counsel for the third respondent.

Dated: 13th December, 2019

Coram: Hon’ble Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.

Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. (Oral)

This Special Appeal is preferred against the order passed

by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 2475 of 2019

dated 13.11.2019.

2.

The order under appeal records that, after arguing for

some time, and on being faced with some legal queries, with regards

the effect of earlier adjudication of the Writ Petition and its impact on

the sustainability of the present Writ Petition, learned counsel had

sought permission to withdraw the Writ Petition; and, consequently,

the Writ Petition was being dismissed as with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top