SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SHIV PRASAD SEMWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['NAGESH AGGARWAL', '', 'GOPAL K VERMA', 'G A']

IA No.683 of 2020 (Urgency Application)

In

BA1 No.2749 of 2019

Hon’ble N.S. Dhanik, J.

Mr. VBS Negi, learned Advocate along

with Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned Advocate

for the applicant.

Mr. A.K. Sah, learned A.G.A. along with

Mr. Sachin Panwar, learned Brief Holder for

the State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The present applicant has sought his

release on bail in connection with Case

Crime No.414 of 2019, under Sections 420,

384, 386, 504, 506 and 120B IPC, registered

at Police Station – Sahaspur, District-

Dehradun.

It is argued by learned counsel for the

applicant that the applicant has falsely been

implicated in the crime and no offence is

made out against him. Apart from that, the

present applicant published only the news

which was disclosed by the co-accused-Amit

Kumar in press conference which is not

denied or disputed by the complainant; no

money was demanded by the present

applicant; complainant has made wrong

averment in his complaint by stating that

the news was published only by the present

applicant whereas the said news was also

published in other news paper including

A.N.I., News India and News Portal; no

specifi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top