RAMESH NAGARKOTI – Appellant
Versus
KEDAR DATT PUROHIT – Respondent
RESERVED JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.426 OF 2018
Between:
Ramesh Nagarkoti S/o Shri Kishan Singh
….Appellant
and
Kedar Datt Purohit S/o Shri Gopal Datt Purohit
……Respondent
Counsel for the appellant
: Mr. Sanjay Kumar.
Counsel for the respondent
: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Pacholia.
Reserved on :19.02.2020
Delivered on :03.03.2021
Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.
This appeal, by special leave, is preferred by the
appellant-complainant against the judgment and order dated
30.11.2018, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Almora in Complaint Case No.01 of 2018, ”Ramesh
Nagarkoti vs. Kedar Datt Purohit”, whereby the learned trial
court acquitted the respondent-accused from the offence
2
punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments
Act, 1881 (for short “the Act, 1881”).
2.
As per the averments made in the complaint, the
complainant and the accused were businessmen and the
complainant had good relations with the accused, who was
the proprietor of “Purohit Agency.” The accused made a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.