HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

(Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting.)

(Chapter VIII Rule 32 (2)(b)

Description of the case

W.P. No. 3563/2001 (S/S)

(Old No. 31083/1998)

Bal Govind Raturi

vs.

State & others.

Approved for reporting

______________________

Not approved for reporting

Date of decision 16.6.2004

Initial of Judge

HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition No. 3563 (S/S) of 2001

(Old No. 31083/1998)

Shri. Bal Govind Raturi.

…. Petitioner

Vs

State of U.P. and others

…. Respondents

Counsel for the petitioner Sh. Rakesh Thapliyal

Standing Counsel for the respondent.

Dated:-

Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J.

Heard Sh. Rakesh Thapliyal Learned counsel for the

petitioner and Standing counsel for the respondent.

By the present writ petition the petitioner has

prayed for the issue of a writ, order or direction in the

nature of mandamus directing the respondents to

appoint the

petitioner on a suitable post on

compassionate ground under Dying in Harness Rules.

Briefly stated that facts giving rise to the present

writ petition are that Sh. Bal Govind Raturi son of late

Shri Rikeshwar Prasad Raturi whose dependent is the