SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SUNEET KUMAR,VIKRAM D CHAUHAN
LOKENDRA AND 5 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 65

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 69 of 2022

Petitioner :- Lokendra And 5 Others

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Antriksh Verma

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.

Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A for the State

respondents.

The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated

22.12.2021, registered as Case Crime No. 0260 of 2021, under sections

376, 406, 506 I.P.C. and Section 67 Information Technology (Amendment)

Act, 2008, Police Station Chandi Nagar, District Baghpat.

Learned A.G.A., at the outset, on instructions, submits that the victim in

her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has reiterated the

prosecution version.

Perusal of the impugned first information report prima facie reveals

commission of cognizable offence. Therefore, in view of the law laid

down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana and

others vs. Bhajan Lal and others, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335 and M/s

Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR

2021 SC 1918 and in Special Leave to Appeal (

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top