SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PRIYANKA BHARTI @ PINKY – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['DAYA SHANKER YADAV', '', 'RAKESH PRASAD', 'G A']

1

Reserved on 24.03.2022

Delivered on 01.04.2022

Court No. - 90

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1338 of 2022

Applicant :- Priyanka Bharti @ Pinky

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Daya Shanker Yadav,Rakesh Prasad

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.

By means of this Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the

applicant has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court for quashing

the charge-sheet No.A 511 of 2021 dated 31.10.2021, cognizance order

dated 25.11.2021 as well as entire criminal proceedings of Sessions Trial

No.581 of 2021 (State Vs. Krishn Kumar Chauhan and others) arising out

of Case Crime No.3 of 2021, under Sections 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters &

Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Robertsganj,

District Sonbhadra, pending before the Additional Session Judge (F.T.C.)

Gangster Act, Sonbhadra.

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the F.I.R.

dated 01.01.2021 registered as Case Crime No.03 of 2021 under Section

3(1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social (Prevention) Act, 1986 has been

lodged on false and frivolous grounds implicating the applican

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top