SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CHHATISH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
['V P GOEL', '', 'SUDHIR DIXIT', 'UTKARSH DIXIT', 'ANUPAM SHYAM DWIVEDI', 'SHIVAM AGARWAL A C', 'A G A']

Reserved

Court No. - 48

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 455 of 1988

Appellant :- Chhatish Singh

Respondent :- State

Counsel for Appellant :- V.P.Goel,Anupam Shyam

Dwivedi,Shivam Agarwal A.C.,Sudhir Dixit,Utkarsh Dixit

Counsel for Respondent :- A.G.A.

connect with

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 578 of 1988

Appellant :- Janak Singh

Respondent :- State Of U.P .

Counsel for Appellant :- Prabodh Gaur,Shivam Agarwal A/C

Counsel for Respondent :- A.G.A

Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

Heard Shri Sudhir Dixit, learned counsel for the appellant in

Criminal Appeal No.455 of 1988 and Shri Shivam Agarwal,

Amicus Curiae for the appellant- Janak Singh in Criminal

Appeal No.578 of 1988.

Both the appeals arise out of the same Sessions Trial No.180 of

1996, which pertains to case Crime No.11 of 1986 under

Section 302 IPC, Police Station Sarai Lakansi, District

Azamgarh. The first information report was lodged at the

concerned police station on 18.01.1986 at 4.30 a.m.

The appellants in both the appeals have been convicted under

Section 302/34 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment.

A third appeal being Appeal No. 397 of 1986 had also been

filed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top