SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
HARIOM AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY HOME AT LUCKNOW – Respondent


Court No. - 72

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1801

of 2022

Applicant :- Hariom And Another

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home At

Lucknow

Counsel for Applicant :- Mukesh Chandra Gupta,Sanjay

Singh,Shubham Prakash Gupta

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.

Heard Shri Sanjay Singh, learned counsel for the applicants,

learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

The present bail application has been filed on behalf of

applicants Hariom and Bantu @ Bhartendu under Section

439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with a prayer to release

them on bail in Case Crime No. 596 of 2021 for offence

punishable under Sections 272, 273, 304 of the Indian Penal

Code and Section 60(A) Excise Act, registered at Police Station

Tajganj, District Agra, during pendency of the trial, after

rejecting the bail application of the applicants by Special Judge

(S.C./S.T. Act), Agra vide order dated 12.11.2021.

Brief facts of the case are that the First Information Report

dated 26.8.2021 has been lodged by father of the deceased Sunil

against five named persons excluding the applicants stating that

son

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top