ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
AJAY BHANOT
PRATIBHA KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1204 of 2021
Petitioner :- Pratibha Kumari
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shams Tabrez Alam Ansari
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Heard Sri Shams Tabrez Alam Ansari, learned counsel for the
petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
Sri Shams Tabrez Alam Ansari, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that the petitioner had entered incorrect
marks in the application form. The error was inadvertent.
Consequent to the error, the petitioner is being denied the
benefit of change of allotted district. Reliance is placed on
Government Order dated 4.12.2020 to contend that inadvertent
errors in the application form are liable to be condoned. The
petitioner has made an application in regard to her change of
allotted district after condoning the error made in the
application form and considering the correct marks of the
petitioner.
The only prayer made by Sri Shams Tabrez Alam Ansari,
learned counsel for the petitioner is that the representation of
the petitioner dated 14.12.2020 be decided within stipulated
period of time.
Per contra l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.