Court No. - 35

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5939 of 2022

Petitioner :- Sandhya Yadav

Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Singh Yadav

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

By means of present writ petition filed under Article 226 of

the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed for direction to

respondent no. 2 to reevaluate the answer book of english

subject for D.El.Ed 2019 fourth semester examination of

the petitioner.

Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing counsel submits that

there are no rules that permit the respondent to conduct

reevaluation of the answer book of the examination

already held in which students have participated, however,

petitioner can apply scrutiny. He submits that nothing has

been brought in the petition to demonstrate that the

petitioner has ever applied for scrutiny in the subject/paper

concerned.

In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner could

not dispute the argument regarding non availability of any

relevant rules to conduct reevaluation of answer book.

In view of above, this Court declines to interfere with the

mater.

This petition is ac