SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

U.P.STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION and OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA and OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['SAMEER SHARMA', '', 'MUKESH KUMAR SINGH', 'V M SAHAI', 'C S C', '', 'RANJEET KUMAR MISHRA', 'DR G S D MISHRA']

Court No. - 38

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13856 of 1998

Petitioner :- U.P.State Road Transport Corporation And Others

Respondent :- Arvind Kumar Gupta And Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Sameer Sharma,Mukesh Kumar

Singh,V.M. Sahai

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dr. G.S.D. Mishra,Ranjeet

Kumar Mishra

Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

List revised. Sri Ranjeet Kumar Mishra learned counsel

representing the respondent-workman states that he has no

instructions in the matter.

Heard Sri Mukesh Kumar Singh learned counsel for the

petitioners.

Challenge has been raied to the award of the Labour Court-IV,

Kanpur dated 27.3.1997 in Adjudication Case (New) No. 313 of

1995. Earlier by order dated 10.5.1995 following reference had

been made to the Labour Court:-

"Kya sewayojkon dwara Sri Arvind Kumar Gupta putra Sri

Babu Lal Gupta-Parichalak ko aadesh dinank 13/6/1983

dwara karya se prithak/vanchit kiya jana uchit evam vaidhanik

hai? Yadi nahi to sambandhit shramik kya hitlaabh/kshatipoorti

paane ka adhikari hai? Kis tithi evam anya kis vivran ke sath?

Answering the above reference, the Labour Court granted relief

of reinstatement with 50 % backwages to the workman.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top