Court No. - 4

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 531 of 2022

Petitioner :- Mangoo Lal And 6 Others

Respondent :- The Board Of Revenue U.P. And 7 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivanshu Kashyap,Ram Lakhan

Kashyap

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

has been filed challenging the order dated 28.07.2006 passed by

the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Lucknow Division, Lucknow

in Appeal No.988 of 1999-2000 as well as against the judgment and

order dated 30.09.2021 passed by the Board of Revenue,

Allahabad (U.P.) in Revision No.87 of 2005-06/Hardoi, filed against

the order of the Additional Commissioner.

Through his order dated 28.07.2006, the Additional Commissioner

has allowed the substitution application filed by the opposite parties

for substituting the heirs of one of the deceased-respondent in

Appeal No.988 of 1999-2000 after setting aside the abatement of

the said appeal. The revision filed against the order of Additional

Commissioner has been rejected by the Board of Revenue.

There is no illegality in orders passed by the revenue courts and

the orders are interlocutory in nature, which do not finally decide

the rights of the parties.

In view of the aforesaid, it is not a fit case for interference under

Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

Order Date :- 24.3.2022

Ashutosh

Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH

SINGH

Date: 2022.03.24 18:22:41 IST

Reason:

Location: High Court of Judicature at

Allahabad