SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JANSAN OSARO – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent


Court No. - 70

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6479

of 2021

Applicant :- Jansan Osaro

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Mishra

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the

State and perused the material available on record.

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with

a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.660 of 2020,

under Sections 420 I.P.C. and 66D of I.T. Act, Police Station

Beta-2, District Gautam Budh Nagar.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that according to the

FIR version by cloning the ATM card money were withdrawn

and on information of the informer, applicant and co-accused

were arrested and from the possession of co-accused,

Rs.10,000/- and certain articles were recovered which were

alleged to be used for cloning. He next submits that the

recovered amount is not connected with any money withdrawn

by the cloning. He further submits that FIR was lodged under

Sections 420 I.P.C. and 66D of I.T. Act and during investigation

commission of offence u/s 66D of I.T. Act was not found,

therefore, section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top