AMAR CHAND PATEL – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent
Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6964 of 2021
Applicant :- Amar Chand Patel
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Kripa Shanker Mishra,Mrityunjay Dwivedi
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
List revised. Despite service of notice, none is present for the informant.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and
perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is
innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has not
committed the present offence. No prima facie case is made out against the
applicant. Victim was major and a consenting party. F.I.R. was lodged by
the victim herself due to pressure created by the family members.
Referring to contents of affidavit, it is further submitted that statement
under Section 164 CrPC was also given by the victim on the basis of
pressure and advise. Neither any symptom of rape nor any sign of protest
was found. The applicant has no criminal history. He is languishing in jail
since 11.11.2020 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the
liberty of bail
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.