SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VIVEK AGARWAL
SAROJ KANJILAL – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 1

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2846 of 2021

Applicant :- Saroj Kanjilal

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Diwan Aslam,Arun Pratap

Singh,Kshitij Shailendra

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.

1. Sri Kshitij Shailendra, learned counsel for the applicant –

Saroj Kanjilal. Sri Janardan Prakash, learned AGA for the State.

2. This application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed

being aggrieved of the summoning order dated 24.10.2019

passed by learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Jhansi in Case No.

2952 of 2019 under section 420 & 506 IPC.

3. Counsel for the applicant submits that in the agreement there

is clause 19.0 which provides for a mechanism for settlement of

disputes. It is submitted that matter has already been referred to

panel of Arbitrators situated at Calcutta and this dispute was

raised by the present applicant who represents M/S RXPE

Projects Private Limited against complainant i.e. M/S Jaya

Engineering & Constructions. It is further submitted that after

initiation of this dispute on 10.9.2018, Arbitral Tribunal has

already passed interim order and therefore in terms of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top