SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ISTYAK @ ISTGAR @ ISTKAR – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P.AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['VIJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI', 'G A', '', 'RAKESH KUMAR TIWARI']

Court No. - 80

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3653 of 2022

Applicant :- Istyak @ Istgar @ Istkar

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Dwivedi

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rakesh Kumar Tiwari

Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.

Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar Dwivedi, the learned counsel for

applicant and the learned A.G.A. for State.

Perused the record.

This application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed

challenging order 14.12.2021, passed by Principal Judge Family

Court, Aligarh in Case No. 1542 of 2019 (Smt. Afroj Vs. Istyak

@ Istgar) under section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station-

Harduaganj, District Aligarh, whereby application for interim

maintenance filed by complainant/opposite party-2 has been

allowed.

Learned counsel for applicant submits that vide order dated

5.11.2018, passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Court No.2, Aligarh in Case No. 2420 of 2015 (Afroz Vs.

Iftqar) under section 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of Protection of

Woman from Domestic Violence Act. P.S. Harduaganj, District

Aligarh, an amount of Rs. 2,000/- was awarded towards interim

maintenance in favour of opposite party-2. Subsequen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top