ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SHAMIM AHMED
NIHAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. and OTHERS – Respondent
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3491 of 2003
Revisionist :- Nihal Singh
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others
Counsel for Revisionist :- Dinesh Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised.
None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision.
Heard Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned A.G.A.-I for the State.
This revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 30.09.2003 passed by
Special Judge (E.C.Act)/Upper Session Judge in Session Trial No. 278/2000 under Section
304 I.P.C.:State Vs. Gokul Singh and others, acquitting the respondent No.2 to 5 by giving
benifit of doubt.
Learned A.G.A.-I submits that the present revision is of the year, 2003 and it appears that due
to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and
there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order passed by the
court below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
I have gone through the judgment and order passed by the court below and also perused the
record. I have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned A.G.A.-I.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.