SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SHAMIM AHMED
NIHAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. and OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 93

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3491 of 2003

Revisionist :- Nihal Singh

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others

Counsel for Revisionist :- Dinesh Kumar Mishra

Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate

Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.

List has been revised.

None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision.

Heard Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned A.G.A.-I for the State.

This revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 30.09.2003 passed by

Special Judge (E.C.Act)/Upper Session Judge in Session Trial No. 278/2000 under Section

304 I.P.C.:State Vs. Gokul Singh and others, acquitting the respondent No.2 to 5 by giving

benifit of doubt.

Learned A.G.A.-I submits that the present revision is of the year, 2003 and it appears that due

to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and

there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order passed by the

court below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.

I have gone through the judgment and order passed by the court below and also perused the

record. I have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned A.G.A.-I.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top