SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
U.P.S.R.T.C – Appellant
Versus
KESHAV CHANDRA NIGAM and ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['R K OJHA', '', 'SAMEER SHARMA', 'SUNIL KUMAR MISRA', 'C S C', '', 'V K SINGH', 'PIYUSH AGRAWAL']

Court No. - 38

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 54222 of 2000

Petitioner :- U.P.S.R.T.C.

Respondent :- Keshav Chandra Nigam And Another

Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K.Ojha,Sameer Sharma,Sunil Kumar Misra

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Piyush Agrawal,V K Singh

Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

List revised. None appears for respondent workman.

Heard Shri Sunil Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the

petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

Present writ petition has been filed by U.P.S.R.T.C. against the

award dated 31.5.2000 passed by the Labour Court, Kanpur, in

Adjudication Case No. 118 of 1999.

The above adjudication case had arisen from the following

reference made, vide order dated 19.5.1999:

"Kya Sewayojakon Dwara Shramik Shri Keshav Chandra Nigam Putra

Swargiya Shri Gore Lal Parichalak Ko 60 Varsh Ki Sewa Nivitri Aayu Ke

Poorn Karne Se Pehle Hi 58 Varsh Ki Hi Aayu Mei Hi Aadesh Dinaank

31.10.95 Dwara Apranh Ke Pashchaat Karya Se Prithak Kar Dinaank

1.11.95 Se Savayein Samampt Kia Jaana Uchit Evam Vaidhanik Hai? Yadi

Nahin Toh Sambhandhit Shramik Kya Hitlaabh/Chatipoorti Paane Ka

Adhikari Hai? Kis Tithi Evam Anya Kis Vivaran Ke Saath?"

The Labour Court had returned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top