SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAJENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['R B GAUR', '', 'GAYATRI KUMARI a c', 'A P PANDEY', 'MANPHOOL SINGH', 'A G A', '', 'ASHUTOSH SHARMA A C']

Reserved on 21.4.2022

Delivered on 18.5.2022

Court No. - 46

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 6100 of 2003

Appellant :- Rajendra Singh

Respondent :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Appellant :- R.B. Gaur,A.P. Pandey,Gayatri Kumari A.

C.,Manphool Singh

Counsel for Respondent :- A.G.A.,Ashutosh Sharma (A.C.)

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.

Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.

[By Mrs. Justice Sadhna Rani (Thakur)]

Law was set into motion with the lodging of the first information

report on 15.5.2000 at about 17.30 hours, on the basis of a written report

submitted by the first informant Ghurai son of Puttu with the allegation

that a villager Rajendra etc. had committed murder of the nephew of the

first informant about six years back and due to that enmity on 15.5.2000,

on a dispute among the children, Rajendra son of Ramnath armed with

banka, Chhutkai son of Ramnath, Sunil son of Ramnath and Ramnath all

armed with lathies, entered into the house of the first informant at about

4.00 ‘O’ Clock in the evening and started hurling filthy abuses. When the

father of the first informant resisted then, Ramnath exhorted other accused

persons to kill the complainant and his father. All the four accused pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top