SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PRAKASH PADIA
DR. YASH NIGAM AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
ATUL NIGAM AND 6 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 10

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 866 of 2021

Petitioner :- Dr. Yash Nigam And Another

Respondent :- Atul Nigam And 6 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Yanendra Pandey,Vaibhav Kumar Pandey

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go

to the private respondents.

The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to Civil Judge

(S.D.) Etawah to decide 6-C application dated 30.05.2020 and

18(ga) application dated 09.07.2020 filed in Original Suit

No.59 of 2020 (Dr. Yash Nigam and another Vs. Atul Nigam

and other) within stipulated period.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without

expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present

petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil

Judge (S.D.) Etawah to consider and decide the aforesaid

application in accordance with law on the next date fixed in the

matter after hearing all the parties concerned. If on account of

any reason no orders were passed on the aforesaid date, the

decision will be taken on the aforesaid application preferably

within a period of 15 days, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top