SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
JAGDISH PRASAD @ JAGGO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. and ANOTHER – Respondent
CRLR 2023/2007



Advocates:
['R K SINGH CHAUHAN', '', 'SMT NEELAM SINGH JADAUN', 'ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA', 'GOVT ADVOCATE']

Court No. - 93

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2023 of 2007

Revisionist :- Jagdish Prasad @ Jaggo

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Revisionist :- R.K. Singh Chauhan,Ashok Kumar Gupta,Smt.

Neelam Singh Jadaun

Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate

Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.

List has been revised.

Heard Sri Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri

Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Vinod

Kant, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri

Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.

This revision has been filed against the order dated 06.07.2007

passed by learned Special Judge E.C. Act Agra in Session Trial

No. 471 of 2006: State versus Bantu alias Raj Kumar and

others,under Sections 302, 120-B I.P.C. by which learned

Special Judge (E.C.Act) Agra had summoned the revisionist

under Section 120-B I.P.C. on the application under Section 319

Cr.P.C.

Shri Vinod Kant submits that the present revision is of the year

2007 and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the

impugned judgment and order passed by the court below,

therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.

After having gone through the judgment and order passed by the

court below and also perusal of the record and the arguments

advanced by learned counsel for the revisionist and learned

Additional Advocate General, this Court comes to the

conclusion that the same need no interference as there is no

illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order under

challenge, therefore, the present revision is liable to be

dismissed.

Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.

Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and

Sessions Judge for its onwards transmission to the concerned

Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the

matter.

The file is consigned to record.

Let the lower Court record, if any, be returned back to the

concerned Court.

Order Date :- 19.5.2022

Arvind

Digitally signed by ARVIND KUMAR

SRIVASTAVA

Date: 2022.05.19 17:33:05 IST

Reason:

Location: High Court of Judicature at

Allahabad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top