ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SUBHASH CHANDRA SHARMA
NEERU DUBEY @ NEELU DUBEY @ SHAILENDRA – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 76
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7445
of 2022
Applicant :- Neeru Dubey @ Neelu Dubey @ Shailendra
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Applicant :- Anjani Kumar Dubey
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Arimardan Yadav,Jadu
Nandan Yadav
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Arimardan Yadav,
learned counsel for complainant as well as learned A.G.A for
the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that he is
innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case for
molesting and committing rape with the victim, daughter of the
informant who went to search the lost goat. F.I.R. was lodged
under Section 354-Kha, 323, 506 IPC and Section 7/8 POCSO
Act for molesting the victim. Later on, the case was converted
under Section 376 IPC on the basis of statement made by the
victim which was under pressure of the parents after 12 days of
the alleged incident. Further submitted that allegation is that the
applicant dragged the victim and tore the cloth, in the
meantime, informant reached there then he fled away. Even in
medical examination, no any
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.