SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ABRAR – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['MOHAMMAD ZAKIR', '', 'CHANDRA BHAN DUBEY', 'ANIL KUMAR DUBEY', 'G A']

Court No. - 67

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2841 of 2021

Appellant :- Abrar

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another

Counsel for Appellant :- Mohammad Zakir,Anil Kumar

Dubey,Chandra Bhan Dubey

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned

A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

This criminal appeal under Section 14 A (2) of Scheduled

Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989

(in short "S.C./S.T. Act") has been filed for setting-aside the

bail rejection order dated 23.12.2020 passed by Special Judge,

SC/ST Act, Bulandshahr in Bail Application No.4175 of 2020

(Abrar vs. State of U.P) in Case Crime No.0253 of 2020, under

Sections 452, 354, 307, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(V) of

SC/ST Act, Police Station-Salempur, District-Bulandshahr.

So far as the report regarding service of notice upon opposite

party no.2 is concerned, the office report dated 31.82021

indicates that notices were duly served upon opposite party no.2

personally but since then they have neither engaged any counsel

nor filed any counter affidavit. Under circumstances, with the

help and aid of learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top