SMT. SITARA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent
RESERVED
A.F.R.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 510 of 2020
Revisionist :- Smt. Sitara Devi
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Revisionist :- Kanchan Chaudhary, C.L.
Chaudhary
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Hakim Kumar Kushwaha,
Rajesh Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
1.
This criminal revision is directed against an order of Mr.
Dinesh Tiwari, Principal Judge, Family Court, Kaushambi dated
19.10.2019, partly allowing the revisionist’s application for
maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and directing the
second opposite party to pay the revisionist maintenance in the
sum of Rs.7000/- per month from the date of order. The
revisionist seeks enhancement of the maintenance awarded,
payable from the date of application.
2.
Heard Mr. C.L. Chaudhary, learned Counsel for the
revisionist and Mr. Hakim Kumar Kushwaha, learned Counsel
appearing on behalf of opposite party No.2.
3.
The revisionist, Smt. Sitara Devi and the second opposite
party, Kamlesh Kumar, are an estranged couple. The parties
were married, according to Hindu rites, on 17th April, 2009.
There are allegations by the wife that she was subjected
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.