SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SMT. SITARA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['KANCHAN CHAUDHARY', '', 'C L CHAUDHARY', 'G A', '', 'RAJESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA', 'HAKIM KUMAR KUSHWAHA']

RESERVED

A.F.R.

Court No. - 1

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 510 of 2020

Revisionist :- Smt. Sitara Devi

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Revisionist :- Kanchan Chaudhary, C.L.

Chaudhary

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Hakim Kumar Kushwaha,

Rajesh Kumar Srivastava

Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.

1.

This criminal revision is directed against an order of Mr.

Dinesh Tiwari, Principal Judge, Family Court, Kaushambi dated

19.10.2019, partly allowing the revisionist’s application for

maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and directing the

second opposite party to pay the revisionist maintenance in the

sum of Rs.7000/- per month from the date of order. The

revisionist seeks enhancement of the maintenance awarded,

payable from the date of application.

2.

Heard Mr. C.L. Chaudhary, learned Counsel for the

revisionist and Mr. Hakim Kumar Kushwaha, learned Counsel

appearing on behalf of opposite party No.2.

3.

The revisionist, Smt. Sitara Devi and the second opposite

party, Kamlesh Kumar, are an estranged couple. The parties

were married, according to Hindu rites, on 17th April, 2009.

There are allegations by the wife that she was subjected

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top