SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAJ NARAIN AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
HARISH CHANDRA MISHRA – Respondent


Advocates:
['VISHNU SAHAI', '', 'B DAYAL', 'S C', '', 'A K RAI']

Court No. - 4

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 53 of 2007

Petitioner :- Raj Narain And Others

Respondent :- Harish Chandra Mishra

Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishnu Sahai,B. Dayal

Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,A.K.Rai

Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.

Rejoinder affidavit filed by the petitioners is taken on record.

Heard the counsel for the petitioners.

The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated

23.4.2005 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) (Second),

District Varanasi allowing the amendment application filed by

the plaintiff - respondent as well as the judgment and order

dated 1.12.2006 passed by the Additional District Judge, Court

No.02, District Varanasi dismissing Civil Revision No. 151 of

2015 filed against the order of the trial court.

The plaintiff - respondent instituted original Suit No. 892 of

1998 for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction

restraining the defendants - petitioners from interfering in the

peaceful possession of the plaintiff over the suit property and

for removing the constructions made by the defendants over the

suit property. In the plaint, the plaintiff also gave a family tree

showing his pedigree to specify as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top