SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
AJAY BHANOT
SHANI KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 68

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9679 of

2022

Applicant :- Shani Kumar

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Satyendra Narayan Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J

Heard Shri Satyendra Narayan Singh, learned counsel

assisted by Sri Pankaj Mishra, learned counsel for the

applicant and learned AGA for the State.

A first information report was lodged against the

applicant as Case Crime No. 10 of 2022 at Police

Station Fafood, District Auraiya under Sections 418,

419, 420, 467, 468, 469, 471, I.P.C. and Sections 66C,

72, 72a of Information Technology (Amendment) Act.

The bail application of the applicant was rejected by

learned Additional Sessions Judge, Auraiya, on

05.02.2022.

The applicant is in jail since 15.01.2022 pursuant to

the said F.I.R.

Shri Satyendra Narayan Singh, learned counsel

assisted by Sri Pankaj Mishra, learned counsel for the

applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely

implicated in the instant case. Learned counsel for the

applicant further submits that the contract of the

applicant for preparation of aadhar cards was

terminated. The applicant did

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top