SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SMT. MANISHA AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND 3 ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['VIVEK KUMAR MISHRA', 'G A', '', 'SUNEEL KUMAR MISHRA']

Court No. - 51

Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 2871 of

2018

Petitioner :- Smt. Manisha And Anr.

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.

Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Kumar Mishra

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Suneel Kumar Mishra

Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.

Hon'ble Ghandikota Sri Devi,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA

appearing on behalf of the State.

Today, Mr. Suneel Kumar Mishra has appeared on behalf of

opposite party no. 4 and filed counter affidavit, the same is

taken on record.

We have perused the earlier order dated 07.03.2018, passed by

another Bench of this Court. It reads as hereinbelow:-

"As per the Office report dated 6.3.2018 notice issued to respondent no. 4

has not been received back after service.

Heard Sri V.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Vikas

Sahai, learned A.G.A., who has accepted notice on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that corpus-petitioner no. 1 as

per the medical examination report is a major girl aged about 20 years

but the learned Magistrate without considering the fact that she is major

sent her to Nari Niketan. He submits that the corpus-petitioner no. 1 in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top