SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PRAKASH PADIA
RUKNUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
HAZI ABDUL KAVI AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 10

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1281 of 2021

Petitioner :- Ruknuddin

Respondent :- Hazi Abdul Kavi And 2 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Udai Chandani

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

Today Advocates are abstaining from work. I have perused the

record.

In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not

issue to the respondents.

The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Article

227 of the Constitution of India inter-alia with the prayer to

direct the respondents not to create any hindrance in the

peaceful living of the petitioner relating to the nature and

possession of the property mentioned in the schedule of the

plaint in Original Suit No. 1322 of 2019 (Ruknuddin Vs. Hazi

Abdul Kavi & others) and further prayer has been made to

direct the Civil Judge (Junior Division) City, Varanasi to decide

the interim injunction application bearing paper no. 6C

supported with affidavit bearing paper no. 7C in Original Suit

No.1322 of 2019 (Ruknuddin Vs. Hazi Abdul Kavi & others)

within stipulated period.

In the facts and circumstances of the case the Court is of the

opinion that the interim injunction filed by the petitioner b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top