SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MANOJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['SHAHNAWAZ AKHTAR', 'G A', '', 'RAVI SHANKAR TRIPATHI']

Court No. - 64

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10626 of 2021

Applicant :- Manoj Kumar

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Shahnawaz Akhtar

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ravi Shankar Tripathi

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the

informant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material

on record.

By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in

Case Crime No. 373 of 2020, under Sections 420, 376D, 323

and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Civil Lines, district-Budaun, is seeking

enlargement on bail during the trial.

The FIR of the incident was lodged in pursuance of an

application moved under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. against the

present accused, co-accused Dr. Hakim Singh and one unknown

person. It was alleged in the FIR that co-accused Dr. Hakim

Singh had made a video clip of the alleged victim and shared

the video clip to present accused. It was also alleged in the FIR

that accused persons have also committed rape with her for a

considerable period after threatening her that they shall get viral

the video clip on internet.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top