SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SONU SINGH URF ASHEESH URF HADBAD – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent


Court No. - 37

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11987

of 2021

Applicant :- Sonu Singh Urf Asheesh Urf Hadbad

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Rabindra Bahadur Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.

Heard Sri Rabindra Bahadur Singh, learned counsel for the

applicant, learned AGA for the State through video

conferencing and perused the record.

This bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant

seeking bail in Case Crime No. 0215 of 2016, under Sections

147, 148, 149, 307, 308, 323, 336, 332, 333, 342, 353, 364A,

364, 368, 427, 504, 506 IPC & 3/4 Prevention of Damage to

Public Property Act, 1984, Police Station Cantt., District

Varanasi, during pendency of trial.

Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his bail prayer

submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been

implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive and he has

committed no offence. It is next contended that the name of the

applicant has been disclosed after eight months of the alleged

occurrence. It is also submitted that the co-accused Vaubhav

Yadav @ Guddu, Haider Ali, Shyam Narain Patel, Rehan Ali,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top