SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AJAY KASHYAP – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['EKANSH VARMA', 'G A', '', 'VIKASH CHANDRA TIWARI']

Court No. - 75

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11054

of 2021

Applicant :- Ajay Kashyap

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Ekansh Varma

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vikash Chandra Tiwari

Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.

Heard over bail application moved by accused-applicant, Ajay

Kashyap, in Case Crime No. 0790 of 2020, under Section 376

IPC and section 3/4 of Protection of Children from Sexual

Offences Act 2012, Police Station Loni, District Ghaziabad.

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-

applicant is innocent; he has been falsely implicated in this very

case crime number and is languishing in jail since 21.9.2020; he

is of no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of fleeing

from course of justice or tempering with evidence in case of

release on bail; prosecutrix is next door neighbour of applicant;

the persons of neighbourhood have not supported occurrence;

there is variance in the statement recorded under sections 161

and 164 Cr.P.C. Inception and sought for help by brother was

not made in her statement recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C..;

it is a false and concocted implication. It was furth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top