SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MOHD. YASEEN AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 84

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6162 of 2022

Applicant :- Mohd. Yaseen And 2 Others

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Shahnawaz Shah

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.

Sri Mohd. Nooruddin Khan, Advocate submits

that although he has already filed his power on

behalf of opposite party no.2 but today his name

is not printed in the cause list.

Heard Sri Syed Shahnawaz Shah, learned counsel

for the applicants, Sri Mohd. Nooruddin, learned

counsel for opposite party no.2 and Dr.

S.B.Maurya, learned AGA-I, for the State, and

perused the record of the case.

The instant application has been filed on behalf

of applicants for quashing the entire proceedings

of Criminal Case No. 460 of 2019 arising out of

Case Crime No.236 fo 2018, under Sections 420

and 468 IPC, Police Station Chandpur, District

Bijnor pending in the court of Civil Judge

(JD)/Judicial Magistrate, Chandpur, District

Bijnor as well as charge sheet dated 20.6.2018

and the cognizance/summoning order dated

28.3.2019.

Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that

the FIR of the present case was lodged by

opposi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top