ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ANKIT CHAUHAN AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/10712/2022
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10712 of 2022
Applicant :- Ankit Chauhan And 2 Others
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Anirudh Pratap Singh Rathor, Rajeshwari
Singh, Sanjeev Kumar Khare
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A.
This is a bail application on behalf of the applicants Ankit Chauhan,
Bablendra and Athendra in connection with Case Crime No.198 of 2021,
under Sections 147, 148, 323, 308, 304 I.P.C., Police Station Buxa, district
Jaunpur.
The submission of learned counsel for the applicants is that the applicants
are quite innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case
with the ulterior motive. He submitted that co-accused Ram Singh
Chauhan and Krishna Kumar @ Kirshna have been admitted to the
concession of bail by another Bench of this Court by order dated
29.09.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.32719 of 2021,
copy of the bail order supplied learned counsel for the applicant has been
perused by this Court and is taken on record and role assigned to
applicants is similar to role of other co-accused, who has already been
enlarged on bail. He claims parity. He submitted that the applicant is
languishing in jail since 05.01.2022, hence he is entitled to be released on
bail and he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the
trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea. However, learned A.G.A. does
not dispute the factum of parity.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations,
the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence
appearing against the accused, submission of learned counsel for the
parties, considering the law laid down in the case of Data Ram Vs. State
of U.P. and others, 2018 (3), SCC, 2 and also the fact that aforesaid co-
accused has been admitted to the concession of bail by this Court, but
without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit
case for bail.
Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.
Let the applicants Ankit Chauhan, Bablendra and Athendra involved in
the aforesaid crime be released on bail on executing a personal bond and
furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the
court concerned with the following conditions:
i) The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
ii) The applicants shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses;
iii) The applicants shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;
iv) The applicants shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of
which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission;
v) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement,
threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as
to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police
officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 29.4.2022
R./
Digitally signed by RAJEEV KUMAR
SACHDEVA
Date: 2022.05.05 11:27:37 IST
Reason:
Location: High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.