ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
NAGINA – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL
APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2161 of 2022
Applicant :- Nagina
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Nanhe Lal Tripathi,Ram Pravesh
Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J.
Counter affidavit filed by the State as well as supplementary
affidavit filed by the applicant are taken on record.
Heard Shri Nanhe Lal Tripathi, learned counsel for the
applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused
the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has
been falsely implicated in this case and all allegations as
contained in the F.I.R. as well as in the statement of the
informant and other witnesses are false, improbable and could
not be believed.
It is further submitted that the applicant is a respectable citizen
of the locality and he is ready to co-operate in the investigation
as well as in the trial, but the local police is trying hard to arrest
without there being any cogent evidence or material and,
therefore, he be provided protection from arrest in the above-
mentioned case.
Learned A.G.A. while refe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.