ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MUNNA LAL – Appellant
Versus
JAI PRAKASH SHAHU – Respondent
Court No. - 6
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1982 of 2022
Petitioner :- Munna Lal
Respondent :- Jai Prakash Shahu
Counsel for Petitioner :- Dileep Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- S.K. Mishra
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct the prayer
clause during the course of the day, to bring it in accord with the relief
that is permissible in a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution.
2.
Heard Mr. Dileep Kumar Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner
and Mr. S.K. Mishra, learned Counsel for the sole respondent.
3.
The petitioner, who is a tenant in a residential accommodation at
Jhansi, is aggrieved by the order of release of the demised accommodation
under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Rent,
Letting and Eviction) Act, 1972 (U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972)1 made by the
Authorities below, concurrently.
4.
The petitioner is a second generation tenant. He has inherited the
tenancy from his father, the late Janki Prasad Sharma, in whose favour,
the demised premises were let out. The petitioner shall hereinafter be
referred to as “the tenant”. Jai Prakash Shahu, who is the landlord and
made the applicat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.