SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJPAL – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND 12 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['MAHENDRA RAM MAURYA', 'C S C', '', 'KAUSHAL KISHORE MANI']

Court No. - 32

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7152 of 2021

Petitioner :- Rajpal

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 12 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahendra Ram Maurya

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushal Kishore Mani

Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing

Counsel for the State respondents.

By means of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution,

the petitioner has questioned the order dated 19.12.2014,

whereby, the petitioner's mutation dated 17.08.2007 has come

to be cancelled and appeal filed against the said order has come

to be rejected by the Additional Commissioner

(Administration), Saharanpur Division, Saharanpur vide order

dated 03.03.2020.

Briefly stated facts of the case are that the petitioner who is a

scheduled caste person and has obtained the land in question by

means of a sale deed executed in his favour by a valid allottee

whose allotment rights have come to be confirmed and

transferred later into Bhumidhari rights. It is also the case of the

petitioner that prior to the execution of sale deed a prior

permission was accorded by Sub Divisional Magistrate

concerned vide order date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top