SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BADDAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['KAMESHWAR SINGH', '', 'MOHD KALIM', 'MARY PUNCHA SHEEB JOSE', 'GOVT ADVOCATE']

A.F.R.

RESERVED

Court No. - 48

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1751 of 2015

Appellant :- Baddan Singh

Respondent :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Appellant :- Kameshwar Singh,Mary Puncha (Sheeb

Jose),Mohd. Kalim

Counsel for Respondent :- Govt.Advocate

Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.

Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.

Suneet Kumar,J.

1.

Heard Ms. Mary Puncha (Sheeb Jose), learned counsel assisted by

Mohd. Kalim, learned counsel for the appellant, Shri Om Prakash Mishra,

learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the lower court

record with the assistance of the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The instant appeal has been filed against the judgment and order

dated 21.04.2015 and conviction order dated 24.04.2015, passed by the

learned Sessions Judge, Banda in Session Trial No. 84 of 2011, whereby,

appellant has been convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life

imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 10,000/-. In case of the default of

payment, the appellant will have to undergo further 2 years simple

imprisonment; appellant has been further convicted under Section 201 IPC

and sentenced to 3 years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 3000/-.

In case of the default

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top