SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI,CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
MANDHIR SINGH TODD AND 6 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 48

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3912 of 2022

Petitioner :- Mandhir Singh Todd And 6 Others

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Anshul Kumar Singhal

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Divakar Rai Sharma

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.

Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.

Heard Sri Anshul Kumar Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri

Divakar Rai Sharma, learned counsel for the complainant and Sri

Arunendra Kumar Singh, the learned A.G.A.

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been

preferred for quashing the proceedings of FIR dated 3.10.2018,

registered as Case Crime No.0719/2018, under Sections

420/467/468/471/120-B/34 IPC, P.S. Noida Phase-II, Gautam Budh

Nagar.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the aforesaid FIR was the

subject matter of challenge in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.32580/2018

(Mandhir Singh Todd and another vs. state of U.P. and Others), wherein

this Court vide order dated 15.11.2018, referred the matter to the

Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court where the parties had

amicably settled the disputes on 16.2.2019

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top