ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SMT. SOMI SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA – Respondent
Court No. - 9
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 149 of 2022
Applicant :- Smt. Somi Sharma
Opposite Party :- Sudhir Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Applicant :- Ghanshyam Pandey
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
This Court vide order dated 22.03.2022 issued notice to
opposite party. As per office report dated 04.05.2022,
undelivered cover has been received with post office
remarks as "Praptkarta diye gaye pate par nahi rehta hai.
Atah wapas."
I have perused the address of the opposite party
mentioned in the plaint as well as notice sent by High
Court. Both are having the same address, therefore, under
such facts of the case, notice is treated to be sufficient and
the Court has proceeded to decide the case on merits.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant
is wife of opposite party and residing at Etah alongwith her
parents. He further submitted that opposite party has filed
Matrimonial Case No. 2279 of 2021 (Sudhir Kumar Sharma
Vs. Smt. Somi Sharma), under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage
Act, 1955 before the Principal Judge, Family Court No. 5,
Ghaziabad, which is around 200 kilometers away from
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.