SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAVINDRA NISHAD AND 9 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['NITYA NAND MISHRA', '', 'NAGENDRA NATH MISHRA', 'G A']

Court No. - 52

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9549 of 2022

Applicant :- Ravindra Nishad And 9 Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Nitya Nand Mishra,Nagendra Nath Mishra

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the

State and perused the material available on record.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to

quash the non bailable warrant order dated 7.4.2021/ 23.9.2021

passed by Speical Judge, SC/ST Act, Gorakhpur in Case Crime

No. 1370 of 2016] (State Vs. Ravindra Nishand and others),

under section 323, 504, 506, 325 IPC and section 3 (1) SC/ST

Act, P.R. Rajghat, District Gorakhpur.

The contention of the learned counsel for the applicants is that

no offence against the applicants is disclosed and the present

prosecution has been instituted with malafide intentions for the

purposes of harassment.

From the perusal of material on record and looking into the

facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is

made out against the applicant. All the submissions made at the

bar relates to the disputed question of fact, wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top