SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MASROOR AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ABAIL/2595/2022



Court No. - 84

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S

438 CR.P.C. No. - 2595 of 2022

Applicant :- Masroor And Another

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others

Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Faiz Hasnain,Mohd. Hasham,Syed Riyaz

Askari

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A.

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on

behalf of the applicants, Masroor and Mansoor in Case Crime

No. 506 of 2021, under sections 452, 307, 323, 504, 506, 354B,

354 I.P.C. and section 3/4 Muslim Women (Protection of Right

on Marriage) Act, 2019, P.S. Kandhala, district-Shamli.

Learned counsel for the applicants contended that the applicants

are the father-in-law and maternal uncle-in-law of the daughter

of the complainant, who are aged about 55 and 57 years

respectively. He next submits that the applicants are the

residents of Ghaziabad and the incident is said to have taken

place in district-Shamli. They are absolutely innocent and have

been falsely implicated in the present case with the ulterior

intention of harassing them. The Investigation in this case is

going on and no chargesheet has been filed against the accused

persons so far. He lastly submits that that there is no criminal

history against the applicants, hence they are entitled to be

enlarged on anticipatory bail. The applicants have definite

apprehension that they may be arrested by the police any time.

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for

anticipatory bail and submitted that there are prima-facie

allegations against the applicants.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and

considering the submission advanced by learned counsel for the

applicants, considering the nature of accusation; possibility of

the applicant to flee from justice; where the accusation has not

been made with the object of injuring or humiliating the

applicant by having him so arrested, this Court finds no good

ground for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant.

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is rejected.

Order Date :- 5.4.2022

Faridul

Digitally signed by FAREEDUL

HASAN

Date: 2022.04.06 11:37:09 IST

Reason:

Location: High Court of Judicature at

Allahabad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top