SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BHAGWAN DAS AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR DISTRICT JALAUN AND 4 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAHUL KUMAR JADAUN', '', 'VINEET VIKRAM', 'MUJEEB KHAN', 'C S C']

Court No. - 32

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8759 of 2020

Petitioner :- Bhagwan Das And Another

Respondent :- Collector District Jalaun And 4 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Kumar Jadaun,Mujeeb

Khan,Vineet Vikram

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.

This writ petition arises out of proceedings under Section 41 of

the L.R. Act. Petitioners have challenged the order dated

16.09.2014 passed by the respondent no. 3 in Revision No. 69-

35 of 2012-13 (Smt. Kishori Devi Vs. Smt. Janaki Devi and

others).

Stamp Reporter has reported a delay of 1907 days in filing the

petition. There is no explanation for such a delay in

approaching this Court.

A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing

Counsel that proceedings under Section 41 of U.P. Land

Revenue Act are summary in nature, against which no writ

petition lies and only remedy left to the petitioners is filing a

regular suit for declaration.

Having heard learned Standing Counsel as well as from perusal

of the records, it appears that proceedings under Section 41 of

the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 are summary in nature as

from the reading of Section 41 (2) (a) it transpir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top