Court No. - 35

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5113 of 2022

Petitioner :- Rajkumar

Respondent :- Syndicate Bank And 2 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar

Counsel for Respondent :- Krishna Mohan Asthana

Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

In compliance of my last order, Sri K.M. Asthana, learned counsel

appearing for the respondent-bank has obtained instructions in the matter

which are taken on record.

By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the

petitioner has questioned the order dated 05.01.2021 passed by respondent

no. 2/ Syndicate Bank, Branch Anaj Mandi, Vrindavan, Mathura, rejecting

the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment. No reason has

been assigned as to what mitigating factors are lacking so as to reject the

claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment.

Per contra, it is argued by counsel for the respondent that as per his

instructions, the claim of the petitioner does not fall on the parameters

upon which the claim for compassionate appointment can be considered.

He submits that instructions are complete in this respect and, therefore,

this Court may not interfere with the or