Court No. - 32

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9226 of 2019

Petitioner :- Prem Sagar Singh And 15 Others

Respondent :- Additional Commissioner And 2 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Sahai,Dinesh Kumar Singh

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Alok Rai,Ashok Kumar

Singh,Manoj Kumar Yadav,Vijay Singh Sengar

Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.

1. Heard Sri Dinesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the

petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.1.

No one has appeared for Gaon Sabha.

2. This writ petition arises out of the proceedings under Section

34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act. The proceedings under the

U.P. Land Revenue Act are summary in nature and no writ

petition lies against the same.

3. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that the proceedings are

summary in nature and no writ petition lies against summary

proceedings. Reliance has been placed upon a decision of this

Court in case of Mathura Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2012

(4) AWC 3825. Learned Standing Counsel further submits that

as the mutation proceedings are summary in nature, petitioner

has a remedy of filing a declaratory suit for declaring his right

under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2016.

4. Having h