ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI
ARTI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5801 of 2021
Petitioner :- Arti Devi
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Suphal Shukla,Lalit Kumar
Gond
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
The petitioner is before this Court for grant for appointment on
compassionate ground. The claim of the petitioner has been
invalidated on the foot that she is a married daughter of the
deceased employee and does not come within the ambit of the
definition of family in the U.P. Dying in Harness Rules, 1974.
Sri Ram Suphal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the order passed by the authority is in the teeth of
the law laid down by the learned Division Bench of this Court
in the case of Vimla Srivastava Vs. State of U.P and another
2016 (8) ADJ 21 (DB) as well as Neha Shukla Special Appeal
Defective No. 863 of 2015.
Learned Standing Counsel could not dispute the applicability of
the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Neha
Srivastava (supra) and Vimla Srivastava (supra) to the facts
of this case.
The right of married daughter to seek employment under the
Dying in Harness Rules
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.